OpenAI and the White House have accused DeepSeek of using ChatGPT to cheaply train its brand-new chatbot.
- Experts in tech law say OpenAI has little option under copyright and agreement law.
- OpenAI's terms of usage might apply but are largely unenforceable, securityholes.science they state.
This week, OpenAI and the White House accused DeepSeek of something comparable to theft.

In a flurry of press statements, akropolistravel.com they stated the Chinese upstart had actually bombarded OpenAI's chatbots with inquiries and hoovered up the resulting information trove to rapidly and cheaply train a design that's now practically as good.

The Trump administration's top AI czar stated this training process, called "distilling," amounted to intellectual residential or commercial property theft. OpenAI, on the other hand, told Business Insider and other outlets that it's investigating whether "DeepSeek might have wrongly distilled our models."

OpenAI is not saying whether the business prepares to pursue legal action, rather assuring what a spokesperson termed "aggressive, proactive countermeasures to protect our technology."

But could it? Could it sue DeepSeek on "you stole our content" grounds, wiki.die-karte-bitte.de similar to the grounds OpenAI was itself sued on in a continuous copyright claim filed in 2023 by The New York Times and other news outlets?

BI posed this concern to professionals in technology law, who said tough DeepSeek in the courts would be an uphill battle for [users.atw.hu](http://users.atw.hu/samp-info-forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=624cf9453ae9b6811fcc71ca0c7261ad&action=profile